Abstract
We investigate long-run firm-level productive growth and technological changes and relate these to the formal and informal institutions and related factors. We conclude that persistency of easing of regulations through broader reforms, including privatization and perception of non-reversal of reforms, helped firms achieve prolonged productivity gains—led by technological changes alongside a socially desirable reduction in CO2 emissions due to energy saving, as well as increased labour usage, despite variations in the quality of formal and informal institutions. Broadly, both formal and informal institutions matter for all firms irrespective of productivity levels and technological gains. Government stability, the country's investment climate, socio-economic conditions, and corruption perception are essential in determining long-run productivity growth and technological changes. However, the role of law and order conditions, political constraints, and competitiveness of the political system/process in determining productivity gains and technological improvements varies by firms’ characteristics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 120993 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Technological Forecasting and Social Change |
| Volume | 171 |
| Early online date | 5 Jul 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Institutional quality
- Productivity
- Reforms
- Socio-economic conditions
- Technological progress
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Institutions and firms’ technological changes and productivity growth'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver