Intelligence-led policing: comparing national approaches to its regulation and control

Adrian James

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review


Intelligence-led policing is increasingly regarded as a pragmatic reality, based on the assumption that pro-active investigation and disruption of criminal activities is more effective than a reactive model of policing. Meanwhile, as intelligence-led policing is spread across many jurisdictions, supported and transferred by institutional vehicles like Interpol and Europol, one could argue that public policing is the subject of a thorough reconfiguration, leading to profound normative questions concerning legitimacy and citizens’ rights. In most liberal democracies, legal rules confine the limits within which intelligence-led policing can be conducted. Interception of telecommunication, the use of surveillance devices and the employment of informers all belong to a growing repertory of intelligence-based policing activities. Increasingly, intelligence-led policing is applied in the context of ordinary policing tasks, making accountability, transparency and procedural rights increasingly relevant in a wide situational variety.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComparative Policing from a Legal Perspective
EditorsMonica den Boer
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-78536-911-7
ISBN (Print)978-1-78536-910-0
Publication statusPublished - 28 Dec 2018

Publication series

NameResearch Handbooks in Comparative Law
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing


Dive into the research topics of 'Intelligence-led policing: comparing national approaches to its regulation and control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this