Interpreting protein/DNA interactions: distinguishing specific from non-specific and electrostatic from non-electrostatic components

P. Privalov, A. Dragan, Colyn Crane-Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We discuss the effectiveness of existing methods for understanding the forces driving the formation of specific protein–DNA complexes. Theoretical approaches using the Poisson–Boltzmann (PB) equation to analyse interactions between these highly charged macromolecules to form known structures are contrasted with an empirical approach that analyses the effects of salt on the stability of these complexes and assumes that release of counter-ions associated with the free DNA plays the dominant role in their formation. According to this counter-ion condensation (CC) concept, the salt-dependent part of the Gibbs energy of binding, which is defined as the electrostatic component, is fully entropic and its dependence on the salt concentration represents the number of ionic contacts present in the complex. It is shown that although this electrostatic component provides the majority of the Gibbs energy of complex formation and does not depend on the DNA sequence, the salt-independent part of the Gibbs energy—usually regarded as non-electrostatic—is sequence specific. The CC approach thus has considerable practical value for studying protein/DNA complexes, while practical applications of PB analysis have yet to demonstrate their merit.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2483-2491
Number of pages9
JournalNucleic Acids Research
Volume39
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Interpreting protein/DNA interactions: distinguishing specific from non-specific and electrostatic from non-electrostatic components'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this