Abstract
With global warming and climate change, the world is experiencing a steady temperature rise. Hence the need for effective and efficient air conditioning,
cooling and refrigeration systems is higher than ever. One of the key elements influencing refrigeration system performance is the working fluid. From 2022, new refrigeration systems in the UK must not use refrigeration fluids with global warming potential (GWP) above 150. Widely used R134a, with GWP of 1430, is therefore being banned and the need for suitable replacement fluids, with equivalent or similar thermodynamic performance, is imminent. This paper looks into the potential of low GWP refrigerant fluids, and assesses their suitability to be utilised as replacement for historically used R134a. Operation of a refrigeration cycle based on R134a is comprehensively compared to selected low GWP fluids in different operating conditions. Low GWP fluids (R152a, R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R290, R600a) were carefully selected to include a broad range of thermophysical properties and cover several fluid categories. Compression work requirement, cooling capacity and the overall performance are evaluated in typical operating scenarios. We conclude that both R1234ze(E) and R1234yf are good alternatives. In particular, R1234yf outperformed R134a by requiring less compression work and achieving significantly higher COP based on the same cooling capacity.
cooling and refrigeration systems is higher than ever. One of the key elements influencing refrigeration system performance is the working fluid. From 2022, new refrigeration systems in the UK must not use refrigeration fluids with global warming potential (GWP) above 150. Widely used R134a, with GWP of 1430, is therefore being banned and the need for suitable replacement fluids, with equivalent or similar thermodynamic performance, is imminent. This paper looks into the potential of low GWP refrigerant fluids, and assesses their suitability to be utilised as replacement for historically used R134a. Operation of a refrigeration cycle based on R134a is comprehensively compared to selected low GWP fluids in different operating conditions. Low GWP fluids (R152a, R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R290, R600a) were carefully selected to include a broad range of thermophysical properties and cover several fluid categories. Compression work requirement, cooling capacity and the overall performance are evaluated in typical operating scenarios. We conclude that both R1234ze(E) and R1234yf are good alternatives. In particular, R1234yf outperformed R134a by requiring less compression work and achieving significantly higher COP based on the same cooling capacity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Energy and Sustainable Futures: Proceedings of the 3rd ICESF, 2022 |
Editors | Jonathan D. Nixon, Amin Al-Habaibeh, Vladimir Vukovic, Abhishek Asthana |
Publisher | Springer |
Chapter | 18 |
Pages | 179 |
Number of pages | 7 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031309601 |
ISBN (Print) | 9783031309595, 9783031309625 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 11 Aug 2023 |
Event | The 3rd International Conference on Energy and Sustainable Futures - Coventry, United Kingdom Duration: 7 Sept 2022 → 8 Sept 2022 Conference number: 3 https://www.coventry.ac.uk/research/about-us/research-events/2022/icesf-2022/ |
Publication series
Name | Springer Proceedings in Energy |
---|---|
Publisher | Springer Nature |
ISSN (Print) | 2352-2534 |
ISSN (Electronic) | 2352-2542 |
Conference
Conference | The 3rd International Conference on Energy and Sustainable Futures |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ICESF |
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Coventry |
Period | 7/09/22 → 8/09/22 |
Internet address |
Keywords
- Global warming potential
- Coefficient of performance
- Cooling capacity replacement fluids
- Thermodynamic assessment