TY - JOUR
T1 - L’analyse de la communication non verbale
T2 - les dangers de la pseudoscience en contextes de sécurité et de justice
AU - Denault, Vincent
AU - Plusquellec, Pierrich
AU - Jupe, Louise M.
AU - St-Yves, Michel
AU - Dunbar, Norah E.
AU - Hartwig, Maria
AU - Sporer, Siegfried L.
AU - Rioux-Turcotte, Jessica
AU - Jarry, Jonathan
AU - Walsh, Dave
AU - Otgaar, Henry
AU - Viziteu, Andrei
AU - Talwar, Victoria
AU - Keatley, David A.
AU - Blandón-Gitlin, Iris
AU - Townson, Clint
AU - Deslauriers-Varin, Nadine
AU - Lilienfeld, Scott O.
AU - Patterson, Miles L.
AU - Areh, Igor
AU - Allan, Alfred
AU - Cameron, Hilary Evans
AU - Boivin, Rémi
AU - Ten Brinke, Leanne
AU - Masip, Jaume
AU - Bull, Ray
AU - Cyr, Mireille
AU - Hope, Lorraine
AU - Strömwall, Leif A.
AU - Bennett, Stephanie J.
AU - Menaiya, Faisal Al
AU - Leo, Richard A.
AU - Vredeveldt, Annelies
AU - Laforest, Marty
AU - Honts, Charles R.
AU - Manzanero, Antonio L.
AU - Mann, Samantha
AU - Granhag, Pär Anders
AU - Ask, Karl
AU - Gabbert, Fiona
AU - Guay, Jean Pierre
AU - Coutant, Alexandre
AU - Hancock, Jeffrey
AU - Manusov, Valerie
AU - Burgoon, Judee K.
AU - Kleinman, Steven M.
AU - Wright, Gordon
AU - Landström, Sara
AU - Freckelton, Ian
AU - Vernham, Zarah
N1 - Article does not have a DOI
PY - 2020/3/30
Y1 - 2020/3/30
N2 - For security and justice professionals, the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use. To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; “Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques”), a method (the BAI; “Behavior Analysis Interview”) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques.
AB - For security and justice professionals, the thousands of peer-reviewed articles on nonverbal communication represent important sources of knowledge. However, despite the scope of the scientific work carried out on this subject, professionals can turn to programs, methods and approaches that fail to reflect the state of science. The objective of this article is to examine (i) concepts of nonverbal communication conveyed by these programs, methods and approaches, but also (ii) the consequences of their use. To achieve this objective, we describe the scope of scientific research on nonverbal communication. A program (SPOT; “Screening of Passengers by Observation Techniques”), a method (the BAI; “Behavior Analysis Interview”) and an approach (synergology) that each run counter to the state of science are examined. Finally, we outline five hypotheses to explain why some organizations in the fields of security and justice are turning to pseudoscience and pseudoscientific techniques.
KW - behavior analysis interview
KW - nonverbal communication
KW - pseudoscience
KW - SPOT
KW - synergology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087962104&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.polymedia.ch/en/magazine/ricpts/
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087962104
SN - 1424-4683
VL - 73
SP - 15
EP - 44
JO - Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique
JF - Revue Internationale de Criminologie et de Police Technique et Scientifique
IS - 1
ER -