Limited knowledge of national plastics policy effectiveness may hinder global progress

Antaya Lauren Alexandra March*, Rachel Karasik, Keiron Roberts, Tegan Rhiannon Evans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

73 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Policy effectiveness is a critical measure for assessing whether policies are working and determining necessary adjustments. However, understanding the effectiveness of plastic policies is a significant gap in the toolkit driving solutions to the plastics crisis. This review examines effectiveness evaluations and existing tools for assessing policy effectiveness. The review further identifies the barriers to understanding effectiveness before proposing ways forward. Most studies focus on plastic bag bans or taxes, neglecting other policy instruments. Additionally, these studies often employ simple attribution approaches, rather than causal inference methods, limiting our ability to determine the true impact of policies on desired outcomes. The lack of monitoring and evaluation of plastic policies further hampers knowledge acquisition. The global understanding of the plastics economy and measurable success metrics is insufficient, hindering the design of systemic interventions. These findings highlight the development and evaluation of plastic policies with limited information. A more nuanced understanding of effective plastic policies is necessary, including a harmonised approach to evaluations, a shared definition of effectiveness, the use of rapid assessment tools, and the integration of monitoring and evaluation into policy instruments.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere14
Number of pages6
JournalCambridge Prisms: Plastics
Volume1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jul 2023

Keywords

  • effectiveness evaluations
  • Policy review
  • barriers
  • Policy instruments
  • plastic pollution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Limited knowledge of national plastics policy effectiveness may hinder global progress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this