Abstract
Large-scale investment projects often involve contestation over competing notions of ‘development’—from promises of economic growth and integration into global value chains to perspectives that emphasise strong connections between people, territory, culture and way of life. This contestation also echoes diverse theories that have variously conceptualised development as growth, freedom, right or sustainability. This article argues that, in the face of such diversity and complexity, the notion of development that underpins international investment law tends to prioritise economic considerations. In the context of investment disputes, this can marginalise the ideas of development advanced by local actors and indigenous peoples. By connecting human rights and development in immediate terms, ongoing discussions about the right to development can provide an arena to centre ‘peoples’ as the key actor in development processes. But this normative shift would also require ensuring that the wider frameworks of international economic law recognise and provide space for plural notions of development.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 270-293 |
Journal | Business and Human Rights Journal |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Dec 2024 |
Keywords
- foreign investment
- international investment law
- investor-State dispute settlement (ISDS)
- right to development
- sustainable development