Measuring carbon emission efficiency in a developing country: a comparative study of sustainability initiatives and non-sustainability initiatives of manufacturing firms

Jahira Debbarma*, Vikas Kumar, Damilola Ekundayo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Improving carbon emission efficiency (CEE) is considered one of the most cost-effective ways to enhance sustainability and address climate change mitigation in developing countries like India. This study analyzes manufacturing firms’ CEE of sustainability initiatives (SI) and non-sustainability initiatives (non-SI) and examines the effect of nationally determined contributions commitments on these firms. A non-radial slack-based model is adopted to assess efficiency over the period 2012-2022. Furthermore, the Tobit model is used to evaluate the influencing factors that promote the CEE of manufacturing firms. Findings reveal that most manufacturing firms in India, both in the SI and non-SI groups, are carbon inefficient due to pure carbon emission inefficiency. Results also indicate that workforce skills training (0.23%) and technological progress (0.14%) positively impact the CEE of manufacturing firms. In addition, SI firms support the Porter hypothesis, suggesting that strict emissions regulations improve efficiency and encourage innovation. Therefore, policymakers in developing countries should implement performance-based policies through trading programs and focus on skilled labor training and technological advancements to address climate change mitigation better and promote sustainability.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBusiness Strategy and the Environment
Publication statusAccepted for publication - 5 Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Carbon emission efficiency
  • sustainability initiatives, SBM-DEA, Tobit model
  • developing country

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring carbon emission efficiency in a developing country: a comparative study of sustainability initiatives and non-sustainability initiatives of manufacturing firms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this