Mixed methods: a paradigm for holistic evaluation of health IT

Philip James Scott

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

481 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This contribution offers an overview of the 'third research paradigm', its historical roots and its relevance for health informatics. Using illustrative studies, we explore the concepts of triangulation and integration of quantitative and qualitative data and refute common philosophical objections to mixing different types of knowledge. We consider how the mixed method paradigm relates to two programme design and evaluation frameworks that are important for health informatics: realist evaluation and Theory of Change. We discuss how to manage practical challenges to this approach and explain how mixed method studies support an evidence-based approach to real world policy, planning and investment decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationEvidence-based health informatics
Subtitle of host publicationPromoting safety and efficiency through scientific methods and ethical policy
EditorsElske Ammenwerth, Michael Rigby
PublisherIOS Press
Pages102-113
Number of pages12
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-61499-635-4
ISBN (Print)978-1-61499-634-7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Publication series

NameStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
PublisherIOS Press
Volume222
ISSN (Print)0926-9630
ISSN (Electronic)1879-8365

Keywords

  • theoretical effectiveness
  • evidence-based practice
  • epistemology
  • informatics
  • outcome and process assessment
  • program evaluation
  • qualitative evaluation
  • quantitative evaluation
  • randomized controlled clinical trials
  • research design

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mixed methods: a paradigm for holistic evaluation of health IT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this