TY - JOUR
T1 - New AHP-based approaches for multi-criteria inventory classification
AU - Lolli, F.
AU - Ishizaka, Alessio
AU - Gamberini, R.
N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in 'International journal of production economics'. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in 'International journal of production economics',156, October 2014, DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015
PY - 2014/10/1
Y1 - 2014/10/1
N2 - Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification (MCIC) groups inventory items with respect to several criteria, in order to facilitate their management. This paper introduces a new hybrid method based on AHP and the K-means algorithm. On benchmarking data, it provides a clearly higher clustering validity index than previous sorting methods. However, as with previous methods, it is a full compensatory method. This means that an item scoring badly on one or more key criteria may still be placed in the best class because these bad scores are compensated. In order to prevent these hidden bad scores, a new variant method is introduced: AHP-K-Veto. The sorting is performed on each single criterion, where a veto system prevents an item evaluated as high/bad on at least one criterion to be top/bottom ranked in the global aggregation. This veto system is an assurance against hidden problems but slightly worsens the clustering validity index.
AB - Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification (MCIC) groups inventory items with respect to several criteria, in order to facilitate their management. This paper introduces a new hybrid method based on AHP and the K-means algorithm. On benchmarking data, it provides a clearly higher clustering validity index than previous sorting methods. However, as with previous methods, it is a full compensatory method. This means that an item scoring badly on one or more key criteria may still be placed in the best class because these bad scores are compensated. In order to prevent these hidden bad scores, a new variant method is introduced: AHP-K-Veto. The sorting is performed on each single criterion, where a veto system prevents an item evaluated as high/bad on at least one criterion to be top/bottom ranked in the global aggregation. This veto system is an assurance against hidden problems but slightly worsens the clustering validity index.
KW - Multiple criteria analysis
KW - Assignment, Inventory
KW - AHP
KW - K-Means
UR - http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925527314001789
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015
DO - 10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.015
M3 - Article
SN - 0925-5273
VL - 156
SP - 62
EP - 74
JO - International Journal of Production Economics
JF - International Journal of Production Economics
ER -