Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements

Alexandre Refregier*, Tomasz Kacprzak, Adam Amara, Sarah Bridle, Barnaby Rowe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Weak lensing experiments are a powerful probe into cosmology through their measurement of the mass distribution of the universe. A challenge for this technique is to control systematic errors that occur when measuring the shapes of distant galaxies. In this paper, we investigate noise bias, a systematic error that arises from second-order noise terms in the shape measurement process. We first derive analytical expressions for the bias of general maximum-likelihood estimators in the presence of additive noise. We then find analytical expressions for a simplified toy model in which galaxies are modelled and fitted with a Gaussian with its size as a single free parameter. Even for this very simple case we find a significant effect. We also extend our analysis to a more realistic six-parameter elliptical Gaussian model. We find that the noise bias is generically of the order of the inverse-squared signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the galaxies and is thus of the order of a percent for galaxies of SNR 10, i.e. comparable to the weak lensing shear signal. This is nearly two orders of magnitude greater than the systematic requirements for future all-sky weak lensing surveys. We discuss possible ways to circumvent this effect, including a calibration method using simulations discussed in an associated paper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1951-1957
Number of pages7
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume425
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Sept 2012

Keywords

  • Cosmology: observations
  • Dark energy
  • Dark matter
  • Gravitational lensing: weak
  • Methods: statistical
  • Techniques: image processing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this