Abstract
Weak lensing experiments are a powerful probe into cosmology through their measurement of the mass distribution of the universe. A challenge for this technique is to control systematic errors that occur when measuring the shapes of distant galaxies. In this paper, we investigate noise bias, a systematic error that arises from second-order noise terms in the shape measurement process. We first derive analytical expressions for the bias of general maximum-likelihood estimators in the presence of additive noise. We then find analytical expressions for a simplified toy model in which galaxies are modelled and fitted with a Gaussian with its size as a single free parameter. Even for this very simple case we find a significant effect. We also extend our analysis to a more realistic six-parameter elliptical Gaussian model. We find that the noise bias is generically of the order of the inverse-squared signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the galaxies and is thus of the order of a percent for galaxies of SNR 10, i.e. comparable to the weak lensing shear signal. This is nearly two orders of magnitude greater than the systematic requirements for future all-sky weak lensing surveys. We discuss possible ways to circumvent this effect, including a calibration method using simulations discussed in an associated paper.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1951-1957 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
| Volume | 425 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 21 Sept 2012 |
Keywords
- Cosmology: observations
- Dark energy
- Dark matter
- Gravitational lensing: weak
- Methods: statistical
- Techniques: image processing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Noise bias in weak lensing shape measurements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver