TY - JOUR
T1 - Norwegian judges’ knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness testimony: a 12-year follow-up
AU - Bjørndal, Ludvig Daae
AU - McGill, Lucy
AU - Magnussen, Svein
AU - Richardson, Stéphanie
AU - Saraiva, Renan
AU - Stadel, Marie
AU - Brennen, Tim
PY - 2020/12/7
Y1 - 2020/12/7
N2 - Eyewitness evidence often plays a critical role in decisions made in the criminal justice system. To evaluate eyewitness testimony accurately, judges must be aware of factors that can contaminate this type of evidence. In 2008, a survey of judges in Norway revealed a lack of awareness of several factors that affect eyewitness testimony. In the current study, a survey was administered to Norwegian judges (N=98) to evaluate their knowledge of factors that affect eyewitness testimony. Results showed that judges’ overall knowledge scores were similar to those reported in 2008, but substantial increases and decreases in knowledge were observed for specific factors. Additional analyses indicated that increased uncertainty regarding some eyewitness factors led to a decline in accuracy when compared to responses observed in 2008. The current study provides an updated assessment of judges’ knowledge of eyewitness factors and highlights the need for more comprehensive training for judges regarding these factors.
AB - Eyewitness evidence often plays a critical role in decisions made in the criminal justice system. To evaluate eyewitness testimony accurately, judges must be aware of factors that can contaminate this type of evidence. In 2008, a survey of judges in Norway revealed a lack of awareness of several factors that affect eyewitness testimony. In the current study, a survey was administered to Norwegian judges (N=98) to evaluate their knowledge of factors that affect eyewitness testimony. Results showed that judges’ overall knowledge scores were similar to those reported in 2008, but substantial increases and decreases in knowledge were observed for specific factors. Additional analyses indicated that increased uncertainty regarding some eyewitness factors led to a decline in accuracy when compared to responses observed in 2008. The current study provides an updated assessment of judges’ knowledge of eyewitness factors and highlights the need for more comprehensive training for judges regarding these factors.
KW - estimator variables
KW - eyewitness testimony
KW - judges
KW - survey
KW - system variables
UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13218719.2020.1837028
U2 - 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837028
DO - 10.1080/13218719.2020.1837028
M3 - Article
SN - 1321-8719
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
JF - Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
ER -