We explore economic incentives for third parties to intervene in on-going internal wars. We develop a three-party model of the decision to intervene in conflict that highlights the role of the economic benefits accruing from the intervention and the potential costs. We present novel empirical results on the role of oil in motivating third party military intervention. We find that the likelihood of a third party intervention increases when a) the country at war has large reserves of oil, b) the relative competition in the sector is limited and c) the potential intervener has a higher demand for oil.
|Journal||Journal of Conflict Resolution: Research on War and Peace between and within Nations|
|Early online date||27 Jan 2015|
|Publication status||Published - 2015|
- Intrastate Conflict
- Third party intervention