Abstract
The article re-examines the key debates concerning the relationship between the Russian factory-committee movement and the Bolshevik Party and Soviet state in 1917-18. It does so with reference to a four-volume collection of documents in Russian on the history of the factory-committees in 1917/18 which first began to be published in 1927 and completed publication in 2002. Rather than the traditional totalitarian view of a movement which was cynically manipulated and dominated by an authoritarian party, what emerges is a much more complex and dynamic relationship. The article in particular argues that the so-called bureaucratisation of the factory-committee movement after the October Revolution emerged out of the practical dilemmas faced by the committees in the economic chaos of 1917/18 and the factory-committee leaders' own desires to promote a rational, planned alternative to that chaos.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 191-207 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Historical Materialism |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Oktyabr’skaya Revolyutsiya i Fabzavkomy [the October revolution and factory-committees] edited by Steve A. Smith, and Oktyabr’skaya Revolyutsia i Fabzavkomy, volume 3, second edition and Oktyabr’skaya Revolyutsiya i Fabzavkomy: Materialy po istorii fabrichno-zavodskikh komitetov, volume 4, edited by Yoshimasa Tsuji'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver