Abstract
In this paper we discuss the historical origins and conceptual debts of the Theory of Mind framework (ToM). We investigate its affinities to Chomsky’s psychology, and Paul Grice’s work on meaning. We find that the ToM framework is resourced by the ideas found in Chomsky and Grice, adding very little new to them, and suffering from the same problems of dualism. ToM inherits the traditional dualistic problem of other minds, tries to solve it, and ends up profoundly intellectualizing social interactions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 601-621 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| Journal | Theory & Psychology |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2004 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the persistence of the ‘Problem of Other Minds’ in psychology: Chomsky, Grice and theory of mind'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver