Abstract
The concept of „open innovation‟ has received a considerable amount of coverage within the academic literature and beyond. Much of this seems to have been without much critical analysis of the evidence. In this chapter we show how Chesbrough creates a false dichotomy by arguing that open innovation is the only alternative to a closed innovation model. We systematically examine the six principles of the open innovation concept and show how the Open Innovation paradigm has created a partial perception by describing something which is undoubtedly true in itself (the limitations of closed innovation principles), but false in conveying the wrong impression that firms today follow these principles. We hope that our examination and scrutiny of the „open innovation‟ concept contributes to the debate on innovation management and helps enrich our understanding.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Open Innovation Research, Management and Practice |
| Editors | Joe Tidd |
| Place of Publication | London |
| Publisher | Imperial College Press |
| Pages | 359-386 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781783262809 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Publication series
| Name | Series on technology management |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Imperial College Press |
| Number | 23 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
Keywords
- Open Innovation,
- Technology Transfer,
- Innovation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Open innovation: old ideas in a fancy tuxedo remedy a false dichotomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver