Perverse audit culture and accountability of the modern public university: audit culture and accountability of the public university

Russell Craig, Joel Amernic, Dennis Tourish

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    776 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The audit culture which has developed in public universities has led to counter-productive outcomes. Managerial oversight of academic work has reached a critical tipping point. Extensive auditing of research output by means of performance management assessment regimes motivated by a New Public Management mentality has damaged individual scholarship and threatened academic freedom. Such assessment regimes are perverse and conducive to the development of psychotic tendencies by universities. It is important to understand the effects of a perverse audit culture when re-thinking and reforming approaches to university performance management. We suggest ways for public universities to acknowledge the need for accountability while remaining true to core academic purposes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-24
    Number of pages25
    JournalFinancial Accounting and Management
    Volume30
    Issue number1
    Early online date16 Jan 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2014

    Keywords

    • accountability
    • audit
    • culture
    • performance
    • public
    • research
    • psychotic
    • university

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Perverse audit culture and accountability of the modern public university: audit culture and accountability of the public university'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this