Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews

Letizia Caso, Nicola Palena, Elga Carlessi, Aldert Vrij

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

98 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Research has shown that a comparable truth baseline (CTB) approach elicits more cues to deception and results in higher accuracy rates than a small talk baseline. Past research focused on laypeople’s accuracy rates. We examined whether the CTB also has a positive effect on law enforcement personnel accuracy. In this study, 95 police officers judged 10 interviews, whereby half of the senders told the truth, and the other half lied about a mock undercover mission. Half of the interviews included only questioning about the event under investigation, whereas the other half also included questioning aimed at creating a CTB. Total and truth accuracy did not differ, but Observers who watched interviews with a CTB obtained higher lie detection accuracy rates than those who watched interviews without the baseline questioning. Signal detection analyses showed that this effect could be attributed to a decreased response bias in the CTB condition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)841-850
Number of pages10
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Volume26
Issue number6
Early online date13 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Police accuracy in truth/lie detection when judging baseline interviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this