Post retentive ability of a new resin composite with low stress behaviour

Agostino Giovannetti; Cecilia Goracci; Alessandro Vichi; Nicoletta Chieffi; Antonella Polimeni; Marco Ferrari

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.007

Post retentive ability of a new resin composite with low stress behaviour

Agostino Giovannetti, Cecilia Goracci^*, Alessandro Vichi, Nicoletta Chieffi, Antonella Polimeni, Marco Ferrari

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Objectives: To assess by means of push-out test the post retentive potential of a new flowable resin composite with low polymerization stress.

Methods: SureFil® SDR™ (Dentsply, S) was compared with the resin cement Calibra (Dentsply, C). S and C were used in combination with the adhesive XP Bond (Dentsply, XPB). In C group the Self-Cure Activator was mixed with XPB. The following types of fibre posts were luted into 30 extracted premolars: Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply, R), DT Light Post (RTD, LP), ER Dentin Post (Komet, ER), DT Light SL (VDW, SL), FibreKleer (Jeneric Pentron, F). Six posted roots per group were tested. Each root provided three to five 1 mm-thick slices. Measured push-out strengths were differentiated by post space level and statistically analysed (p < 0.05). The failure mode of each debonded specimen was assessed.

Results: Cement type did not have a significant effect on post retention (p = 0.54). Post type was a significant factor for push-out strength (p < 0.001). LP exhibited significantly higher retentive strength than SL and F; push-out strengths of ER and R were significantly higher than those of F. Post retention was significantly influenced by post space level (p < 0.001). Significantly higher push-out strengths were recorded at the coronal third than at the middle and apical levels. The post-cement interaction was significant (p = 0.002). Posts luted with S most often failed at the cement-post interface.

Conclusions: When the new flowable low-stress composite was used to lute fibre posts, similar retentive strengths to those of a marketed cement from the same manufacturer were achieved.

Clinical significance: SureFil® SDR™, a flowable composite originally proposed for bulk filling of posterior restorations, exhibited post retentive strengths similar to those of a cement by the same manufacturer. With a relatively high filler load, yet a low curing stress, SureFil® SDR™ may be adequate for both post cementation and core build-up.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	322-328
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Dentistry
Volume	40
Issue number	4
Early online date	24 Jan 2012
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.007
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2012

Keywords

failure mode
low-stress
luting
post
push-out
resin composite

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.007

Cite this

@article{5b83714b4bcb447b81fe7e56f58690f5,

title = "Post retentive ability of a new resin composite with low stress behaviour",

abstract = "Objectives: To assess by means of push-out test the post retentive potential of a new flowable resin composite with low polymerization stress.Methods: SureFil{\textregistered} SDR{\texttrademark} (Dentsply, S) was compared with the resin cement Calibra (Dentsply, C). S and C were used in combination with the adhesive XP Bond (Dentsply, XPB). In C group the Self-Cure Activator was mixed with XPB. The following types of fibre posts were luted into 30 extracted premolars: Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply, R), DT Light Post (RTD, LP), ER Dentin Post (Komet, ER), DT Light SL (VDW, SL), FibreKleer (Jeneric Pentron, F). Six posted roots per group were tested. Each root provided three to five 1 mm-thick slices. Measured push-out strengths were differentiated by post space level and statistically analysed (p < 0.05). The failure mode of each debonded specimen was assessed. Results: Cement type did not have a significant effect on post retention (p = 0.54). Post type was a significant factor for push-out strength (p < 0.001). LP exhibited significantly higher retentive strength than SL and F; push-out strengths of ER and R were significantly higher than those of F. Post retention was significantly influenced by post space level (p < 0.001). Significantly higher push-out strengths were recorded at the coronal third than at the middle and apical levels. The post-cement interaction was significant (p = 0.002). Posts luted with S most often failed at the cement-post interface. Conclusions: When the new flowable low-stress composite was used to lute fibre posts, similar retentive strengths to those of a marketed cement from the same manufacturer were achieved. Clinical significance: SureFil{\textregistered} SDR{\texttrademark}, a flowable composite originally proposed for bulk filling of posterior restorations, exhibited post retentive strengths similar to those of a cement by the same manufacturer. With a relatively high filler load, yet a low curing stress, SureFil{\textregistered} SDR{\texttrademark} may be adequate for both post cementation and core build-up.",

keywords = "failure mode, low-stress, luting, post, push-out, resin composite",

author = "Agostino Giovannetti and Cecilia Goracci and Alessandro Vichi and Nicoletta Chieffi and Antonella Polimeni and Marco Ferrari",

year = "2012",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.007",

language = "English",

volume = "40",

pages = "322--328",

journal = "Journal of Dentistry",

issn = "0300-5712",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Post retentive ability of a new resin composite with low stress behaviour

AU - Giovannetti, Agostino

AU - Goracci, Cecilia

AU - Vichi, Alessandro

AU - Chieffi, Nicoletta

AU - Polimeni, Antonella

AU - Ferrari, Marco

PY - 2012/4/1

Y1 - 2012/4/1

N2 - Objectives: To assess by means of push-out test the post retentive potential of a new flowable resin composite with low polymerization stress.Methods: SureFil® SDR™ (Dentsply, S) was compared with the resin cement Calibra (Dentsply, C). S and C were used in combination with the adhesive XP Bond (Dentsply, XPB). In C group the Self-Cure Activator was mixed with XPB. The following types of fibre posts were luted into 30 extracted premolars: Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply, R), DT Light Post (RTD, LP), ER Dentin Post (Komet, ER), DT Light SL (VDW, SL), FibreKleer (Jeneric Pentron, F). Six posted roots per group were tested. Each root provided three to five 1 mm-thick slices. Measured push-out strengths were differentiated by post space level and statistically analysed (p < 0.05). The failure mode of each debonded specimen was assessed. Results: Cement type did not have a significant effect on post retention (p = 0.54). Post type was a significant factor for push-out strength (p < 0.001). LP exhibited significantly higher retentive strength than SL and F; push-out strengths of ER and R were significantly higher than those of F. Post retention was significantly influenced by post space level (p < 0.001). Significantly higher push-out strengths were recorded at the coronal third than at the middle and apical levels. The post-cement interaction was significant (p = 0.002). Posts luted with S most often failed at the cement-post interface. Conclusions: When the new flowable low-stress composite was used to lute fibre posts, similar retentive strengths to those of a marketed cement from the same manufacturer were achieved. Clinical significance: SureFil® SDR™, a flowable composite originally proposed for bulk filling of posterior restorations, exhibited post retentive strengths similar to those of a cement by the same manufacturer. With a relatively high filler load, yet a low curing stress, SureFil® SDR™ may be adequate for both post cementation and core build-up.

AB - Objectives: To assess by means of push-out test the post retentive potential of a new flowable resin composite with low polymerization stress.Methods: SureFil® SDR™ (Dentsply, S) was compared with the resin cement Calibra (Dentsply, C). S and C were used in combination with the adhesive XP Bond (Dentsply, XPB). In C group the Self-Cure Activator was mixed with XPB. The following types of fibre posts were luted into 30 extracted premolars: Radix Fiber Post (Dentsply, R), DT Light Post (RTD, LP), ER Dentin Post (Komet, ER), DT Light SL (VDW, SL), FibreKleer (Jeneric Pentron, F). Six posted roots per group were tested. Each root provided three to five 1 mm-thick slices. Measured push-out strengths were differentiated by post space level and statistically analysed (p < 0.05). The failure mode of each debonded specimen was assessed. Results: Cement type did not have a significant effect on post retention (p = 0.54). Post type was a significant factor for push-out strength (p < 0.001). LP exhibited significantly higher retentive strength than SL and F; push-out strengths of ER and R were significantly higher than those of F. Post retention was significantly influenced by post space level (p < 0.001). Significantly higher push-out strengths were recorded at the coronal third than at the middle and apical levels. The post-cement interaction was significant (p = 0.002). Posts luted with S most often failed at the cement-post interface. Conclusions: When the new flowable low-stress composite was used to lute fibre posts, similar retentive strengths to those of a marketed cement from the same manufacturer were achieved. Clinical significance: SureFil® SDR™, a flowable composite originally proposed for bulk filling of posterior restorations, exhibited post retentive strengths similar to those of a cement by the same manufacturer. With a relatively high filler load, yet a low curing stress, SureFil® SDR™ may be adequate for both post cementation and core build-up.

KW - failure mode

KW - low-stress

KW - luting

KW - post

KW - push-out

KW - resin composite

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857918693&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.007

M3 - Article

C2 - 22305777

AN - SCOPUS:84857918693

SN - 0300-5712

VL - 40

SP - 322

EP - 328

JO - Journal of Dentistry

JF - Journal of Dentistry

IS - 4

ER -

Post retentive ability of a new resin composite with low stress behaviour

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this