Power, powerlessness, and journal ranking lists: the marginalization of fields of practice

Valerie Anderson, Carole Elliott, Jamie Callahan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    104 Downloads (Pure)


    This essay contributes a new perspective to debates about journal ranking lists and their effects on the practice of scholarship. Our argument is grounded in practice theory and draws on Bourdieu’s concept of field. We examine the effect of metrics, targets and rankings on Human Resource Development (HRD), a conjunctive field associated with the Management Learning and Education (MLE) field. We examine the ways in which the boundaries of the MLE field are shaped by journal ranking lists and how, irrespective of seniority in the field, scholars simultaneously experience both power and powerlessness as a result of journal ranking processes. We contribute a new perspective on issues of academic practice with consequences for specialized areas of scholarship. We conclude by proposing practical interventions that senior scholars and journal editors can undertake to challenge the undesirable effects of ranking systems and encourage scholarly diversity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number0
    Pages (from-to)0
    JournalAcademy of Management Learning and Education (AMLE)
    Early online date3 Jan 2020
    Publication statusEarly online - 3 Jan 2020


    • management education
    • management learning
    • publishing


    Dive into the research topics of 'Power, powerlessness, and journal ranking lists: the marginalization of fields of practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this