Abstract
Highway pavements deteriorate over time as successive wheel loads cause rutting, cracking, texture loss etc. Design standards and pavement performance models account for some of the known contributory factors, such as levels of traffic and vehicle composition. However, such models are limited in their predictive power, and highway authorities must conduct regular pavement condition surveys rather than relying on the standard deterioration models alone. The ways in which multiple factors affect pavement deterioration, including rutting, are complex and are believed to include feedback loops where rutting then influences driving position, exacerbating the rutting levels. Standard regression models are not well suited to representing such complex causal mechanisms. This paper compares two alternative modelling approaches, Structural Equations Models and Auto-Machine Learning and evaluates the predictive ability and practicalities of each. The findings indicate that Auto-Machine Learning (AutoML) may be superior in its predictive ability. However, their “black-box” nature makes the results potentially less useful to practitioners. A process of using machine learning to help inform a structural equations model is proposed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies |
Early online date | 21 Sept 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Early online - 21 Sept 2023 |
Keywords
- Auto-Machine Learning
- Structural Equation Modeling
- Traffic Load
- Channelisation
- Pavement Deterioration
- Rutting
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predictive modeling for highway pavement rutting: A comparative analysis of auto-machine learning and structural equation models'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Dataset for 'Relationship Between Channelisation and Geometric Characteristics of Road Pavements'.
Woods, L. (Creator) & Sinanmis, R. (Data Collector), University of Portsmouth, 31 Jan 2020
DOI: 10.17029/18574367-9809-4ced-a1f9-d72be47d6e3c
Dataset
File