Professional desire, competence and engagement in IS context

Peter Bednar, Christine Welch

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

100 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper attempts to address the failings of a predominant paradigm in IS research and practice that emphasises technological determinism. This paradigm makes use of a false belief in the power of rationality in organizational decision-making, and a mythology in which organizational actors can be viewed as passive ‘users’ of technology. We wish to create a discussion of the nature and role of professionalism as an expression of more than technical competence. Both system analysts and organizational stakeholders (e.g. ‘users’) are to be viewed as professionals. We discuss desire, exercise of will and their role in professional judgement in relation to transcendent values espoused within communities of practice. We go on to relate this to the environments of Information Systems research and practice. It is pointed out that many researchers, over a number of years, have dealt with these issues in relation to effective management of technological development and organizational change. The paper attempts to encourage renewed attention to interpretivist perspectives on IS development and organizational change, including recognition of the importance of contextual dependencies
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationManagement of the interconnected world
EditorsA. D'Atri, M. De Marco, A. Braccini, F. Cabiddu
Place of PublicationHeidelberg
PublisherSpringer
Pages359-365
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)9783790824032
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Publication series

NameDatabase management and information retrieval
PublisherPhysica Verlag (Springer)

Keywords

  • systems analysis
  • professional judgement
  • contextual dependencies
  • interpretive research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Professional desire, competence and engagement in IS context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this