Pteranodon and beyond: the history of giant pterosaurs from 1870 onward

Mark Witton

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

    Abstract

    The immense size of many pterosaurs is now well known to academics and laymen alike, but truly enormous forms with wingspans more than twice those of the largest modern birds were not discovered until 83 years after the first pterosaur fossils were found. These remains were discovered in an expedition to the Cretaceous chalk deposits of Kansas led by O.C. Marsh in 1870: initially revealing animals with 6.6m wingspans, Marsh eventually found material from animals estimated to span 7.6m. Marsh's record breaking pterosaur - the largest flying animal known for nearly 80 years - was equalled by a supposed wing bone described by C.A. Arambourg in 1954, and then surpassed with the discovery of the 10m span azhdarchid Quetzalcoatlus northropi by D. Lawson in 1972. Subsequent fragmentary azhdarchid discoveries suggest even larger forms: reinterpreting Arambourg's 'wing bone' as a cervical vertebra suggests an animal with a 11-13m wingspan, while the Romanian taxon Hatzegopteryx thambema ia a particulary large and robust form with a 12m wingspan. Giant pterosaur footprints are also known, with the largest footprints recording walking azhdarchids of comparable size to those suggested by body fossils.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationDinosaurs and other extinct saurians - a historical perspective
    EditorsR. Moody, E. Buffetaut, David Martill, Darren Naish
    Place of PublicationLondon
    PublisherGeological Society of London
    Pages313-323
    Number of pages11
    Edition343
    ISBN (Print)9781862393110
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Publication series

    NameGSL Special Publication
    PublisherGeological Society
    Number343

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Pteranodon and beyond: the history of giant pterosaurs from 1870 onward'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this