Public health versus private practice: the contested development of compulsory infectious disease notification in late-nineteenth century Britain

G. Mooney

doi:10.1353/bhm.1999.0087

Public health versus private practice: the contested development of compulsory infectious disease notification in late-nineteenth century Britain

G. Mooney

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	238-267
Number of pages	30
Journal	Bulletin of the History of Medicine
Volume	73
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1353/bhm.1999.0087
Publication status	Published - 1999

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1353/bhm.1999.0087

Cite this

@article{23731f5ea4554ebaba02c14c3efd69cb,

title = "Public health versus private practice: the contested development of compulsory infectious disease notification in late-nineteenth century Britain",

author = "G. Mooney",

year = "1999",

doi = "10.1353/bhm.1999.0087",

language = "English",

volume = "73",

pages = "238--267",

journal = "Bulletin of the History of Medicine",

issn = "0007-5140",

publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public health versus private practice: the contested development of compulsory infectious disease notification in late-nineteenth century Britain

AU - Mooney, G.

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

U2 - 10.1353/bhm.1999.0087

DO - 10.1353/bhm.1999.0087

M3 - Article

SN - 0007-5140

VL - 73

SP - 238

EP - 267

JO - Bulletin of the History of Medicine

JF - Bulletin of the History of Medicine

IS - 2

ER -