Randomized, double-blind comparison of patient-controlled epidural infusion vs nurse-administered epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing colonic resection

J. Nightingale, M. Knight, Bernard Higgins, Tara Dean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background There is little published evidence of the analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) for postoperative pain relief. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of epidural infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl 4 µg ml−1 administered by either PCEA with a background infusion or nurse-administered continuous epidural infusion (CEI) after major intra-abdominal surgery. Methods In a double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 205 adult patients undergoing colonic resection by laparotomy received either PCEA or CEI. Pain scores were recorded via a four-point verbal rating scale at 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery. The administration of epidural top-ups and systemic analgesia over the same period was also recorded, and patient satisfaction questionnaires completed. Results The median area under the curve of pain against time was significantly lower in the PCEA group (2 vs 24, P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)380-384
Number of pages5
JournalBJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia
Volume98
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized, double-blind comparison of patient-controlled epidural infusion vs nurse-administered epidural infusion for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing colonic resection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this