Reading lies: nonverbal communication and deception

Aldert Vrij, Maria Hartwig, Pär Anders Granhag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2846 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The relationship between nonverbal communication and deception continues to attract much interest, but there are many misconceptions about it. In this review, we present a scientific view on this relationship. We describe theories explaining why liars would behave differently from truth tellers, followed by research on how liars actually behave and individuals’ ability to detect lies. We show that the nonverbal cues to deceit discovered to date are faint and unreliable and that people are mediocre lie catchers when they pay attention to behavior. We also discuss why individuals hold misbeliefs about the relationship between nonverbal behavior and deception—beliefs that appear very hard to debunk. We further discuss the ways in which researchers could improve the state of affairs by examining nonverbal behaviors in different ways and in different settings than they currently do.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-317
JournalAnnual Review of Psychology
Volume70
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • RCUK
  • ESRC
  • ES/N009614/1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reading lies: nonverbal communication and deception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this