Reconciling coercion in the constitution of the American republican state

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In fracturing the imperial bond and rejecting the sovereignty of the King in Parliament, the patriots of 1776, and after 1783 Americans, embarked upon a remarkable conversation concerning the form of the state, the nature of governance, and the character of republican citizenship. Central to this process, but lacking in sustained focus, was the contentious issue of the role of coercion requisite to sustain the revolutionary process and respect the virtuous character of a free people. This article argues that the experience of building a state, with particular focus on the Commonwealth of Virginia, ensured that the framers eventually became reconciled to the paradoxes of coercion in securing the safety of the new nation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-230
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of Early American History
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • history
  • American Revolution
  • U.S. Constitution
  • coercion
  • Virginia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconciling coercion in the constitution of the American republican state'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this