Redshift evolution and covariances for joint lensing and clustering studies with DESI Y1

Sihan Yuan*, Chris Blake*, Alex Krolewski, Johannes Lange, Jack Elvin-Poole, Alexie Leauthaud, Joseph DeRose, Jessica Nicole Aguilar, Steven Ahlen, Gillian Beltz-Mohrmann, David Brooks, Todd Claybaugh, Axel de la Macorra, Peter Doel, Ni Putu Audita Placida Emas, Simone Ferraro, Jaime E. Forero-Romero, Cristhian Garcia-Quintero, Enrique Gaztañaga, Satya Gontcho A. GontchoBoryana Hadzhiyska, Sven Heydenreich, Klaus Honscheid, Mustapha Ishak, Shahab Joudaki, Eric Jullo, Theodore Kisner, Anthony Kremin, Andrew Lambert, Martin Landriau, Marc Manera, Aaron Meisner, Ramon Miquel, Jundan Nie, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Claire Poppett, Anna Porredon, Mehdi Rezaie, Ashley J. Ross, Graziano Rossi, Rossana Ruggeri, Eusebio Sanchez, Christoph Saulder, Hee Jong Seo, Joseph Harry Silber, Gregory Tarln, Mariana Vargas-Magaña, Benjamin Alan Weaver, Enia Xhakaj, Zhimin Zhou

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Galaxy–galaxy lensing (GGL) and clustering measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Year 1 (DESI Y1) data set promise to yield unprecedented combined-probe tests of cosmology and the galaxy–halo connection. In such analyses, it is essential to identify and characterize all relevant statistical and systematic errors. We forecast the covariances of DESI Y1 GGL + clustering measurements and the systematic bias due to redshift evolution in the lens samples. Focusing on the projected clustering and GGL correlations, we compute a Gaussian analytical covariance, using a suite of N-body and lognormal simulations to characterize the effect of the survey footprint. Using the DESI one percent survey data, we measure the evolution of galaxy bias parameters for the DESI luminous red galaxy (LRG) and bright galaxy survey (BGS) samples. We find mild evolution in the LRGs in 0.4 < z < 0.8, subdominant to the expected statistical errors. For BGS, we find less evolution for brighter absolute magnitude cuts, at the cost of reduced sample size. We find that for a redshift bin width ∆z = 0.1, evolution effects on DESI Y1 GGL is negligible across all scales, all fiducial selection cuts, all fiducial redshift bins. Galaxy clustering is more sensitive to evolution due to the bias squared scaling. Nevertheless the redshift evolution effect is insignificant for clustering above the 1-halo scale of 0.1h−1 Mpc. For studies that wish to reliably access smaller scales, additional treatment of redshift evolution is likely needed. This study serves as a reference for GGL and clustering studies using the DESI Y1 sample.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)589-607
Number of pages19
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume533
Issue number1
Early online date24 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • galaxies: haloes
  • large-scale structure of Universe
  • methods: numerical
  • methods: statistical
  • UKRI
  • STFC

Cite this