Abstract
We revisit the standard “telescoping sum” argument ubiquitous in the final steps of analyzing evaluation complexity of algorithms for smooth nonconvex optimization, and obtain a refined formulation of the resulting bound as a function of the requested accuracy ɛ. While bounds obtained using the standard argument typically are of the form O(ɛ-α) for some positive α, the refined results are of the form o(ɛ-α). We then explore to which known algorithms our refined bounds are applicable and finally describe an example showing how close the standard and refined bounds can be.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 515-527 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Computational Optimization and Applications |
| Volume | 92 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 24 Jul 2025 |
Keywords
- Nonlinear optimization
- Complexity theory
- Global convergence rates
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Refining asymptotic complexity bounds for nonconvex optimization methods, including why steepest descent is o(ɛ-2) rather than O(ɛ-2)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver