Abstract
Background: The Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) is an indicator of thrombopoiesis which is a useful parameter in thrombocytopenia. It demonstrates compensatory mechanisms in production of platelets, but currently not implemented in routine clinical practice. The aim of this study was to establish the reproducibility and stability of IPF, for both percentage (%-IPF) and absolute (A-IPF) measurements.
Material/methods: A total of 71 samples, of which 45 for reproducibility and 26 for stability analysis, were assayed for full blood count using the Sysmex XN-10 analyser at room temperature (RT:19–25 °C). For reproducibility analysis, IPF measurements were analysed 11 times by different appraisers using the same sample, while for stability analysis, IPF was measured over fourteen hourly-intervals up to 24 h (n = 21) and then separately extended beyond the point of stability to 72 h (n = 5).
Results: Reproducibility analysis of %-IPF and A-IPF (n = 45) showed very reliable results, with the range of mean CV% values between 1.25–8.90% and 1.70–9.96%, respectively. On the other hand, overall, stability analysis of %-IPF and A-IPF (n = 21) at RT over 24 h showed reliable results, with pooled mean CV% values of 1.32% and 1.43%, respectively, with no significant difference between %-IPF and A-IPF (p = 0.767 and p = 0.821). All %-IPF and A-IPF values had exceeded the set acceptance criterion of stability (CV% ≥ 10.0%) before 72 h.
Conclusions: Overall, %-IPF and A-IPF reproducibility and storage at RT for 24 h predominantly demonstrates the suitability of their usage for testing on the Sysmex XN-series analysers.
Material/methods: A total of 71 samples, of which 45 for reproducibility and 26 for stability analysis, were assayed for full blood count using the Sysmex XN-10 analyser at room temperature (RT:19–25 °C). For reproducibility analysis, IPF measurements were analysed 11 times by different appraisers using the same sample, while for stability analysis, IPF was measured over fourteen hourly-intervals up to 24 h (n = 21) and then separately extended beyond the point of stability to 72 h (n = 5).
Results: Reproducibility analysis of %-IPF and A-IPF (n = 45) showed very reliable results, with the range of mean CV% values between 1.25–8.90% and 1.70–9.96%, respectively. On the other hand, overall, stability analysis of %-IPF and A-IPF (n = 21) at RT over 24 h showed reliable results, with pooled mean CV% values of 1.32% and 1.43%, respectively, with no significant difference between %-IPF and A-IPF (p = 0.767 and p = 0.821). All %-IPF and A-IPF values had exceeded the set acceptance criterion of stability (CV% ≥ 10.0%) before 72 h.
Conclusions: Overall, %-IPF and A-IPF reproducibility and storage at RT for 24 h predominantly demonstrates the suitability of their usage for testing on the Sysmex XN-series analysers.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-96 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 29 Feb 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2024 |