Risk and protection: the discourse of confinement in contemporary mental health policy

G. Moon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Confinement has regained respectability in the discourses of contemporary UK mentalhealthpolicy. This development reflects concern about violent offences by people with mentalhealth problems and is rooted in claims about the ‘failure’ of community care. Confinement is presented as a strategic response to the risks and dangers posed by particular fractions of the population of mentalhealth service users. Using two key policy statements issued by the Department of Health and associated discussions in the health services management press, the confinement theme is explored and assessed. The paper notes its emergence as a consequence of the spatial impacts of deinstitutionalisation and its specific origins in response to violent offences by people with mentalhealth problems. The notion that the growing emphasis on confinement presages a return to the asylum is considered and rejected. Rather, the paper stresses the importance of discourses of protection, safety, risk and dangerousness in understanding the turn to confinement.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)239-250
    Number of pages12
    JournalHealth & Place
    Volume6
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2000

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Risk and protection: the discourse of confinement in contemporary mental health policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this