Self administered witness interviews – part IV

Lorraine Hope, F. Gabbert, A. Heaton-Armstrong, D. Wolchover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Conclusion of discussions on a resource-led procedure for expediting and enhancing the accuracy of witness accounts Improvement of the quality and accuracy of parole evidence and diminution of its “memory test” aspect Apart from the issue of consistency, there will be a more general respect in which the SAI© may conduce to a better quality of evidence going before the court.
Original languageEnglish
JournalCriminal Law & Justice Weekly
Volume177
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 19 Jan 2013

Cite this