Sexualities and accounting: a queer theory perspective

Nick Rumens*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    249 Downloads (Pure)


    There is a paucity of research on sexuality within accounting studies in general, and next to nothing on lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans* (LGBT) sexualities in particular. One major problem associated with this neglect is that the heteronormative bias within the accounting studies goes unchallenged, reproducing a heterosexual/homosexual binary that posits heterosexuality as a normative standard by which other sexualities are judged and found wanting. Challenging the heteronormativity that pervades accounting studies and organisations, this article contributes to this knowledge void by presenting a new line of research which examines LGBT sexualities. It is argued that queer theory can enable accounting scholars to disrupt heteronormativity, destabilise essentialist notions sexuality as fixed properties of individuals and thus advance the study of sexuality within accounting beyond topics such as sexual harassment. Three research trajectories with example research questions are presented to that end: (1) disrupting heteronormativity; (2) queering accounting organisations; (3) queer allies in accounting contexts. In sum, this article underscores the utility of queer theory to accounting and sexuality research and practice, and calls for increased research activity of this type in this area.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)111-120
    JournalCritical Perspectives On Accounting
    Early online date7 May 2016
    Publication statusPublished - May 2016


    • Accounting studies
    • Cabinets comptables
    • Diversidad
    • Diversité
    • Firmas de contabilidad
    • Heteronormativity
    • Igualdad
    • LGBT people
    • Queer theory
    • Sexuality
    • Social
    • Work lives
    • Égalité


    Dive into the research topics of 'Sexualities and accounting: a queer theory perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this