Should research ethics committees police reporting bias?

Simon Erik Kolstoe
, Daniel R. Shanahan
, Janet Wisely

Institute of Life Sciences and Healthcare

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article

Original language	English
Number of pages	2
Journal	British Medical Journal (BMJ)
Volume	356
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1501
Publication status	Published - 27 Mar 2017

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.j1501

3 Citations
2 Comment/debate
1 Article
1 Other contribution

A National Clinical Trial Audit System to Improve Clinical Trials Reporting
HealthWatch UK, Universities Allied for Essential Medicines UK, TranspariMED & Kolstoe, S., 17 Oct 2017, 6 p. Science and Technology Committee (Commons).
Research output: Other contribution

Open Access
Research ethics committees/boards should routinely publish primary and secondary outcomes of all ethically approved research
Kolstoe, S., 5 Apr 2017, In: British Medical Journal (BMJ). 356, j1501
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Open Access
Solving the problems of publication and submission bias is an important step, but the focus must now turn to outcome reporting bias
Kolstoe, S., 3 May 2017, In: British Medical Journal (BMJ). 357, j1726
Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Open Access
Can UK NHS research ethics committees effectively monitor publication and outcome reporting bias?
Begum, R. & Kolstoe, S., 25 Jul 2015, In: BMC Medical Ethics. 16, p. 51
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Open Access
File
206 Downloads (Pure)

Cite this

@article{afab39720724441c811825275e84af9d,

title = "Should research ethics committees police reporting bias?",

author = "Kolstoe, \{Simon Erik\} and Shanahan, \{Daniel R.\} and Janet Wisely",

year = "2017",

month = mar,

day = "27",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.j1501",

language = "English",

volume = "356",

journal = "British Medical Journal (BMJ)",

issn = "0959-8138",

publisher = "British Medical Association",

}