Abstract
This paper questions whether the 'new economic geography's 'specification of change in industrial economies is accurate, or whether it is overly driven by a search for processes of change within a capitalist system characterised by crisis and instability. We suggest that some of the processes that might engender stability are recognised but under-valued within a perspective dominated by a political economy approach. This contention is explored at the three levels of inter-personal and intra-organisational relations, structures of business enterprise, and inter-organisational collaboration and co-ordination, including regulation theory. We suggest, in conclusion that stability and certainty should be seen to represent more than the absence of crisis. A geography of economic stability may be long overdue.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-299 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Area |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - 1995 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Stability and instability: the uncertainty of economic geography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver