TY - JOUR
T1 - Strain and micromotion in intact and resurfaced composite femurs
T2 - experimental and numerical investigations
AU - Pal, Bidyut
AU - Gupta, Sanjay
AU - New, Andrew M. R.
AU - Browne, Martin
PY - 2010/7/20
Y1 - 2010/7/20
N2 - Understanding the load transfer within a resurfaced femur is necessary to determine the influence of mechanical factors on potential failure mechanisms such as early femoral neck fractures and stress shielding. In this study, an attempt has been made to measure the stem-bone micromotion and implant cup-bone relative displacements (along medial-lateral and anterior-posterior direction), in addition to surface strains at different locations and orientations on the proximal femur and to compare these measurements with those predicted by equivalent FE models. The loading and the support conditions of the experiment were closely replicated in the FE models. A new experimental set-up has been developed, with specially designed fixtures and load application mechanism, which can effectively impose bending and deflection of the tested femurs, almost in any direction. High correlation coefficient (0.92–0.95), low standard error of the estimate (170–379 με) and low percentage error in regression slope (12.8–17.5%), suggested good agreement between the numerical and measured strains. The effect of strain shielding was observed in two (out of eight) strain gauges located on the posterior side. A pronounced strain increase occurred in strain gauges located on the anterior head and neck regions after implantation. Experimentally measured stem-bone micromotion and implant cup-bone relative displacements (0–13.7 μm) were small and similar in trends predicted by the FE models (0–25 μm). Despite quantitative deviations in the measured and numerical results, it appears that the FE model can be used as a valid predictor of the actual strain and stem-bone micromotion.
AB - Understanding the load transfer within a resurfaced femur is necessary to determine the influence of mechanical factors on potential failure mechanisms such as early femoral neck fractures and stress shielding. In this study, an attempt has been made to measure the stem-bone micromotion and implant cup-bone relative displacements (along medial-lateral and anterior-posterior direction), in addition to surface strains at different locations and orientations on the proximal femur and to compare these measurements with those predicted by equivalent FE models. The loading and the support conditions of the experiment were closely replicated in the FE models. A new experimental set-up has been developed, with specially designed fixtures and load application mechanism, which can effectively impose bending and deflection of the tested femurs, almost in any direction. High correlation coefficient (0.92–0.95), low standard error of the estimate (170–379 με) and low percentage error in regression slope (12.8–17.5%), suggested good agreement between the numerical and measured strains. The effect of strain shielding was observed in two (out of eight) strain gauges located on the posterior side. A pronounced strain increase occurred in strain gauges located on the anterior head and neck regions after implantation. Experimentally measured stem-bone micromotion and implant cup-bone relative displacements (0–13.7 μm) were small and similar in trends predicted by the FE models (0–25 μm). Despite quantitative deviations in the measured and numerical results, it appears that the FE model can be used as a valid predictor of the actual strain and stem-bone micromotion.
U2 - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.019
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-9290
VL - 43
SP - 1923
EP - 1930
JO - Journal of Biomechanics
JF - Journal of Biomechanics
IS - 10
ER -