Surfaces and depths: evaluating the theoretical assumptions of cognitive skills programmes

T. Ward, Claire Nee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Cognitive skills programmes for offenders such as Reasoning and Rehabilitation (R & R) have been around now for over 20 years and were developed in part to address their poor reasoning and decision-making skills. In this paper we critically examine the theoretical underpinnings of the R & R programme in light of current theoretical developments and research from cognitive neuroscience, philosophy, biology, and psychology. After considering recent theoretical and empirical research on rationality, emotions, distributed cognition, and embodiment we conclude with some thoughts about how to fine-tune cognitive skills programmes such as R & R in light of this research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)165-182
JournalPsychology, Crime & Law
Volume15
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surfaces and depths: evaluating the theoretical assumptions of cognitive skills programmes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this