Abstract
The three studies reported examine judgment about the attempts of footballers
(soccer players) to deceptively exaggerate the effect of a tackle. Study one reveals that
non-professional participants agree about which players were attempting deception and
those that were not; there was also agreement about the tackles in which the intentions
were ambiguous. Study two demonstrates that the intentions of tackled players match the
judgment of their intentions by observers. Study three provides a taxonomy of behaviors
that are associated with deceptive and non deceptive intentions. We conclude that
deceptive intentions in this context are to a degree manifest in behavior and are observable.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Journal of Nonverbal Behavior |
Volume | 34 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |