Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

“Tandem” nanomedicine approach against osteoclastogenesis: polysulfide micelles synergically scavenge ROS and release rapamycin

  • Farah El Mohtadi
  • , Richard d’Arcy
  • , Jason Burke
  • , Julio M. Rios De La Rosa
  • , Arianna Gennari
  • , Roberto Marotta
  • , Nora Francini
  • , Robert Donno
  • , Nicola Tirelli*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    We show the first example of a synergic approach of oxidant (ROS) scavenging carrier and ROS-responsive drug release in the context of a potential therapy against osteoporosis, aiming to inhibit the differentiation of inflammatory cells into osteoclasts. In our “tandem” approach, a branched amphiphilic, PEGylated polysulfide (PPSES–PEG) was preferred over a linear analogue, because of improved homogeneity in the aggregates (spherical micelles vs mixture of wormlike and spherical), increased stability, and higher drug loading (up to ∼22 wt % of antiosteoclastic rapamycin). These effects are ascribed to the branching inhibiting crystallization in the polysulfide blocks. The ROS-scavenging micelles alone were already able to reduce osteoclastogenesis in a RAW 264.7 model, but the “drug” combination (the polymer itself + rapamycin released only under oxidation) completely abrogated the process. An important take-home message is that the synergic performance depended very strongly on the oxidant: oxidizable group molar ratio, a parameter to carefully tune in the perspective of targeting specific diseases.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)305-318
    Number of pages14
    JournalBiomacromolecules
    Volume21
    Early online date3 Dec 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Feb 2020

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '“Tandem” nanomedicine approach against osteoclastogenesis: polysulfide micelles synergically scavenge ROS and release rapamycin'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this