Abstract
Asking interviewees to imagine talking to a ghostwriter, results in more information and veracity cues than an instruction to be detailed (Leal et al., 2019). We examined reasons why the ghostwriter instruction worked: The ghostwriter determines (i) what to report / omit and (ii) in which order to report the provided information. Taking away these decisions from the interviewee creates a more lenient output criterion what to report. Participants discussed a trip they had made (truth tellers) or pretended to have made (lie tellers). Interviews took place under three conditions: Control condition, Ghostwriter condition where participants were asked to imagine talking to a ghostwriter and Enhanced Ghostwriter condition where participants were also told what the benefits are of talking to a ghostwriter. The Enhanced Ghostwriter condition resulted in more information than the control condition. Most veracity cues emerged in the Enhanced Ghostwriter condition and fewest cues in the control condition.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 74–84 |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 3 Jun 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2025 |
Keywords
- Deception
- Lie detection
- Ghostwriter method
- Telling it all
- Keeping it simple
- UKRI
- ESRC
- ES/N009614/1