Ten Principles for Procuring Better Outcomes

Walter Menteth; Lucy Carmichael; Royal Institute of British Architects

Ten Principles for Procuring Better Outcomes

Walter Menteth (Editor), Lucy Carmichael (Editor), Royal Institute of British Architects

Research output: Book/Report › Commissioned report

Abstract

Any building can be designed to serve its intended purpose, be efficient to build, maintain and operate, and have a positive impact on the community it serves. Effective public procurement that prioritises good design outcomes can maximise the social, environmental and economic benefits of development. But sometimes as a result of poor procurement practice or lack of in-house expertise, public clients don’t get what they expected and communities don’t get the buildings they deserve. This document clarifies how client organisations can get the best possible outcomes when they procure architectural services.

Original language	English
Place of Publication	London
Publisher	RIBA
Commissioning body	RIBA Publishing
Number of pages	32
Edition	1
Publication status	Published - Mar 2015

Access to Document

https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/ten-principles-for-procuring-better-outcomes

2 Discussion paper
1 Book
1 Commissioned report
1 Monograph
More
- 1 Other chapter contribution
- 1 Paper

Transforming public procurement: Response to the December 2020 Government Green paper
Menteth, W. & Curtis, R., Mar 2021, London: Project Compass CIC. 18 p.
Research output: Book/Report › Monograph › peer-review

Open Access
Guidance to architects when engaging with local public sector procurement bodies: RIBA Procurement Reform Group
Menteth, W. & Dobson, A., 22 Oct 2013, RIBA, 2 p.
Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper

Open Access
Building ladders of opportunity: how reforming construction procurement can drive growth in the UK economy
Menteth, W. & Tozer, L., Jan 2012.
Research output: Contribution to conference › Paper › peer-review

Open Access
Introduction
Menteth, W., 2012, Building ladders of opportunity: How reforming construction procurement can drive growth in the UK economy. London: RIBA, p. 7 1 p.
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Other chapter contribution

Open Access
Item 5 Procurement Reform: RIBA Practice & Profession Committee
Menteth, W., 2 Feb 2012, London: RIBA, 17 p.
Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper

Open Access

2 Publication peer-review
2 Membership of committee or panel
2 Membership of council
1 Consultancy
More
- 1 Membership of network or group

RIBA (Publisher)
Menteth, W. (Peer reviewer)
Oct 2015
Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work types › Publication peer-review
RIBA (Publisher)
Menteth, W. (Peer reviewer)
Jul 2013
Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work types › Publication peer-review
Client conversations: Insights into successful project outcomes
Menteth, W. (Advisor)
Jun 2013
Activity: Consultancy types › Consultancy
Royal Institute of British Architects (External organisation)
Menteth, W. (Member)
1 Sept 2011 → …
Activity: Membership types › Membership of council
Royal Institute of British Architects (External organisation)
Menteth, W. (Member)
Aug 2011 → Jul 2017
Activity: Membership types › Membership of council

Cite this

@book{602f49b16eb64b3c84364e8cb01c44f0,

title = "Ten Principles for Procuring Better Outcomes",

abstract = "Any building can be designed to serve its intended purpose, be efficient to build, maintain and operate, and have a positive impact on the community it serves. Effective public procurement that prioritises good design outcomes can maximise the social, environmental and economic benefits of development. But sometimes as a result of poor procurement practice or lack of in-house expertise, public clients don{\textquoteright}t get what they expected and communities don{\textquoteright}t get the buildings they deserve. This document clarifies how client organisations can get the best possible outcomes when they procure architectural services.",

author = "\{Royal Institute of British Architects\}",

editor = "Walter Menteth and Lucy Carmichael",

year = "2015",

month = mar,

language = "English",

publisher = "RIBA",

address = "United Kingdom",

edition = "1",

}

TY - BOOK

T1 - Ten Principles for Procuring Better Outcomes

AU - Royal Institute of British Architects

A2 - Menteth, Walter

A2 - Carmichael, Lucy

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - Any building can be designed to serve its intended purpose, be efficient to build, maintain and operate, and have a positive impact on the community it serves. Effective public procurement that prioritises good design outcomes can maximise the social, environmental and economic benefits of development. But sometimes as a result of poor procurement practice or lack of in-house expertise, public clients don’t get what they expected and communities don’t get the buildings they deserve. This document clarifies how client organisations can get the best possible outcomes when they procure architectural services.

AB - Any building can be designed to serve its intended purpose, be efficient to build, maintain and operate, and have a positive impact on the community it serves. Effective public procurement that prioritises good design outcomes can maximise the social, environmental and economic benefits of development. But sometimes as a result of poor procurement practice or lack of in-house expertise, public clients don’t get what they expected and communities don’t get the buildings they deserve. This document clarifies how client organisations can get the best possible outcomes when they procure architectural services.

UR - https://www.architecture.com/-/media/gathercontent/ten-principles-for-procuring-better-outcomes/additional-documents/tenprinciplesforprocuringbetteroutcomes2016versionpdf.pdf

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Ten Principles for Procuring Better Outcomes

PB - RIBA

CY - London

ER -

Ten Principles for Procuring Better Outcomes

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Research output

Activities

Cite this