Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)

Rauand Duhoky, Ritch Geitenbeek, Guglielmo Piozzi, Shamsul Kabir Masum, Adrian Alan Hopgood, Jim Briggs, Esther Consten*, Jim Khan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Total mesorectal excision is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery, with laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches commonly employed. While robot-assisted surgery may offer technical advantages, there is limited evidence comparing short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques, particularly in Western European populations. This study aimed to assess the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Methods: This multicentre, international, retrospective cohort study included 1749 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted total mesorectal excision from January 2014 to January 2024. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to minimise confounding. Primary outcomes were length of stay, operative time, and conversion rates. Secondary outcomes included complications and pathological outcomes within 90 days, and readmissions and reinterventions within 30 days.

Results: The final cohort included 680.9 laparoscopic and 1057.5 robot-assisted cases after weighting. Robot-assisted surgery showed lower conversion rates (6.1% vs. 3.5%, p=0.025), higher rates of primary anastomosis (80.1% vs. 92.1%, p<0.001), and fewer stoma formations (78.4% vs. 63.7%, p<0.001). Pathological outcomes indicated a higher rate of complete mesorectal excision in the robot-assisted group (77.2% vs. 86.0%, p<0.001), though this data was not available for all centres. Operative time was longer in the robot-assisted cohort (181.0 vs. 220.0 minutes, p<0.001), but no significant differences were observed in postoperative complications, length of stay, anastomotic leakage or 30-day reintervention rates.

Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery low anterior resection demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with lower conversion rates, higher rates of complete mesorectal excision, and higher restorative procedure rates, which may influence longer-term oncological and patient quality of life outcomes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1614–1626
JournalJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume117
Issue number8
Early online date26 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Total Mesorectal Excision
  • Rectal Cancer
  • Propensity Score-weighted
  • Laparoscopy
  • Robot-assisted Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten years of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (short-term RESOLUTION)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this