Abstract
Obtaining detailed accounts from individuals who have witnessed complex events under challenging encoding conditions presents a difficulty for investigators. In the present research, participants (N = 132) reported their recall of an event witnessed under full or divided attention using a timeline reporting format. Extending the timeline technique to assess the relative performance of two additional mnemonics—self-generated cues (SGC) and other-generated cues (OGC)—participants provided an account across three timeline reporting conditions comparing the efficacy of SGC, OGC, and no cues (control). Mock-witnesses using SGC provided more correct details than mock-witnesses in the OGC or no-cues conditions, under full but not under divided attention conditions. There was no difference between cue conditions with respect to the number of errors reported across attention conditions. Findings show SGC to be a promising addition to interviewing techniques as a retrieval support mnemonic with implications for applied contexts.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 454-461 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 21 Apr 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2018 |
Keywords
- RCUK
- ESRC
- ES/N009614/1
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The benefits of a self-generated cue mnemonic for timeline interviewing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
Data availability statement for 'The Benefits of a Self-Generated Cue Mnemonic for Timeline Interviewing'.
Kontogianni, F. (Creator), Hope, L. (Creator), Taylor, P. J. (Creator), Vrij, A. (Creator) & Gabbert, F. (Creator), Elsevier BV, 21 Apr 2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.03.006, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211368117301171?via%3Dihub
Dataset