The changing legitimacy of health and safety, 1960-2015: understanding the past, preparing for the future

Paul Almond, Mike Owen Esbester

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

‘Health and safety’ currently has an image problem in the UK. This article explores the origins of these current negative perceptions, framed around the concept of legitimacy – the degree to which a policy project of this sort is viewed as right, proper, and appropriate. The article considers and evaluates key moments in the growth and decline of social consensus around health and safety since 1960, including the Robens Committee and subsequent Health and Safety at Work Act, the decline of trade unionism, the extension of health and safety beyond the workplace, and the rise of the safety profession. It concludes that change has been much more subtle and less uniform than general perceptions might suggest, and makes recommendations for how public engagement with occupational health and safety might be restructured.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-96
JournalPolicy and Practice in Health and Safety
Volume14
Issue number1
Early online date5 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Keywords

  • commercialization
  • expertise
  • Health and Safety at Work Act 1974
  • law reform
  • leadership
  • perceprions policy recommendations
  • public image
  • regulation
  • trades unions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The changing legitimacy of health and safety, 1960-2015: understanding the past, preparing for the future'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • IOSH 2016

    Mike Esbester (Participant)

    22 Jun 2016

    Activity: Participating in or organising an event typesParticipation in conference

Cite this