The convergent validity of three surveys as alternative sources of health information to the 2011 UK census

Joanna Taylor, Liz Twigg, Graham Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

68 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Censuses have traditionally been a key source of localised information on the state of a nation's health. Many countries are now adopting alternative approaches to the traditional census, placing such information at risk. The purpose of this paper is to inform debate about whether existing social surveys could provide an adequate ‘base’ for alternative model-based small area estimates of health data in a post traditional census era. Using a case study of 2011 UK Census questions on self-assessed health and limiting long term illness, we examine the extent to which the results from three large-scale surveys – the Health Survey for England, the Crime Survey for England and Wales and the Integrated Household Survey – conform to census output. Particularly in the case of limiting long term illness, the question wording renders comparisons difficult. However, with the exception of the general health question from the Health Survey for England all three surveys meet tests for convergent validity.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-192
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume116
Early online date12 Jun 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2014

Keywords

  • RCUK
  • ESRC
  • ES/K003046/1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The convergent validity of three surveys as alternative sources of health information to the 2011 UK census'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this