Abstract
This article examines the 1985 Achille Lauro hijacking within the broader evolution of maritime political violence from 1961 to 1985. It demonstrates how passenger vessels were transformed from incidental targets into deliberate symbols of political warfare by analysing the trajectory from the Santa Maria incident in 1961 to the Achille Lauro crisis in 1985. The research reveals a distinct pattern in the evolution of maritime terrorism: initial acts focused on political asylum and liberation movements gradually gave way to more violent, media-conscious operations designed to maximize psychological impact. The Achille Lauro incident represents both a culmination of earlier maritime terrorist tactics and a departure in its combination of cruise ship targeting, passenger nationality as selection criteria, and the complex international legal challenges it precipitated. This analysis contributes to understanding how maritime terrorism evolved as a distinct subset of political violence, shaped by the unique characteristics of ships as isolated, mobile, and symbolically rich targets.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 463-475 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Mariner's Mirror |
| Volume | 111 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Achille Lauro
- maritime terrorism
- hijacking
- political violence
- international law
- cruise ships
- Santa Maria
- Mediterranean
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Achille Lauro incident in historical context: Maritime hijacking as a political weapon 1961–1985'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver