Abstract
We investigate the effect of microlensing on the standardisation of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae (GLSNe Ia). We present predictions for the amount of scatter induced by microlensing across a range of plausible strong lens macromodels. We find that lensed images in regions of low convergence, shear and stellar density are standardisable, where the microlensing scatter is comparable to the intrinsic dispersion of a typical SN Ia. These standardiable configurations correspond to the outer image of an asymmetric double for lenses with large Einstein radii. Quadruple image systems, symmetric doubles and small Einstein radii lenses are not standardisable. We apply our model to the recently discovered GLSN Ia iPTF16geu and find that the large discrepancy between the observed flux and the macromodel predictions from More et al. 2016 cannot be explained by microlensing alone. Using the mock GLSNe Ia catalogue of Goldstein et al. 2017, we predict that ~22% of GLSNe Ia discovered by LSST will be standardisable, with a median Einstein radius of 0.9 arcseconds and a median time-delay of 41 days. By breaking the mass-sheet degeneracy the full LSST GLSNe Ia sample will be able to detect systematics in H0 at the 0.5% level.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 5081-5090 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society |
Volume | 478 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 22 May 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Aug 2018 |
Keywords
- astro-ph.CO
- astro-ph.GA
- RCUK
- STFC
- ST/N000668/1
- gravitational lensing: strong
- gravitational lensing: micro
- supernovae: general
- supernovae: individual: iPTF16geu
- cosmological parameters
- cosmology: observations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of microlensing on the standardisation of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Can strongly lensed type 1a supernovae resolve cosmology's biggest controversy?
1/03/18 → 3/03/18
2 Media contributions
Press/Media: Expert comment