The Nationalisation of UK Aid and Development - The End of Aid?

Melita Lazell, Ivica Petrikova

Research output: Book/ReportBook

Abstract

Since the creation of the Department for International Development, the purpose of UK development policy and aid has changed significantly. The Nationalisation of UK Aid and Development provides a comprehensive evaluation of these changes, their causes, and their implications. Lazell and Petrikova argue that UK development aid as an act of solidarity, economic justice, or redistribution, which has always been undermined by donor interest and colonialism, has been abolished. The authors present a new framework for understanding the UK’s current approach to development policy and aid, the ‘nationalisation’ of aid, which prioritises narrow domestic commercial and political interests at the expense of sustainable development and the UK’s international reputation. Based on new quantitative and qualitative data, this book offers a nuanced and comprehensive exploration of the UK's approach to aid and development, contributing to broader discussions on the evolving nature of development assistance and its implications. With a combination of rigorous research methods and insightful analysis, it not only advances scholarly understanding within the fields of Politics, International Relations, Development Studies, and International Political Economy, but also provides practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners seeking to navigate the complexities of contemporary development assistance.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Number of pages249
ISBN (Electronic)9783031642418
ISBN (Print)9783031642401, 9783031642432
Publication statusAccepted for publication - 1 Feb 2024

Publication series

NameBuilding a Sustainable Political Economy: SPERI Research & Policy
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Cham
ISSN (Print)2946-3394
ISSN (Electronic)2946-3408

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Nationalisation of UK Aid and Development - The End of Aid?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this