TY - JOUR
T1 - The positioning of the prosecution service in the Netherlands and England and Wales
T2 - Lessons from one extreme to another
AU - Pakes, Francis J.
PY - 1999
Y1 - 1999
N2 - It has been widely acknowledged that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), has since it came into existence, had an unsteady start. Part of the problem relates to its relation and communication with its criminal justice partners, by which we mean courts, police and local and central government. A key issue in this respect appears to be striking a balance between independence and autonomy on the one hand, and close contact and the establishment of 'partnership' on the other hand. This paper examines how this balance is struck in the Netherlands, where the Prosecution service (Openbaar Ministerie) is strikingly different in nature, but faces very similar problems. It will be argued that a slightly more relaxed attitude on the CPS's independence might open the door to more fruitful relationship with the criminal justice partners in the field. Several examples concerning this in the Netherlands will be presented and discussed.
AB - It has been widely acknowledged that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), has since it came into existence, had an unsteady start. Part of the problem relates to its relation and communication with its criminal justice partners, by which we mean courts, police and local and central government. A key issue in this respect appears to be striking a balance between independence and autonomy on the one hand, and close contact and the establishment of 'partnership' on the other hand. This paper examines how this balance is struck in the Netherlands, where the Prosecution service (Openbaar Ministerie) is strikingly different in nature, but faces very similar problems. It will be argued that a slightly more relaxed attitude on the CPS's independence might open the door to more fruitful relationship with the criminal justice partners in the field. Several examples concerning this in the Netherlands will be presented and discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53149097779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1023/A%3A1005681600654
DO - 10.1023/A%3A1005681600654
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:53149097779
SN - 0144-932X
VL - 21
SP - 261
EP - 274
JO - Liverpool Law Review
JF - Liverpool Law Review
IS - 2-3
ER -